Published 2005
Journal article Open

Manadeva Samvat: An investigation into an historical fraud

Creators

Description

Between Ganadeva (Samvat 479-487) and sivadeva I (Samvat 512-535) there is no king named Maanadeva. Although the gap is about 25 years, there is no trace of "Maanadeva II) in Mangal Bazaar, Patan's inscription of Bhaaravi, dated Samvat 492, nor in Desabhattaarikaa's sankhamula inscription dated Samvat 495. Had there been an outstanding king, able to found an epoch era with a name, Maanadeva, this era should have been used, by sivadeva I, in his Visnupaadkaa Phedi inscription of Samvat 512. At least, Jayadeva II's Pasupati inscription dated Samvat 157 should have mentioned him if there were an illustrious king able to found an epoch era which Jayadeva II himself had used.

Files

6691.pdf

Files (859.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:62107300ef923535c0900581170c5ae4
859.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Publishing information

Title
Contributions to Nepalese Studies, Centre for Nepal and Asian Studies (CNAS), Tribhuvan University (TU), Kathmandu, Nepal. Volume 32, Number 1, January 2005: http://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/contributions/pdf/CNAS_32_01_01.pdf. Digital Himalaya: http://www.digitalhimalaya.com/collections/journals/contributions/index.php?selection=32_0

Others

Special note
MFOLL

Legacy Data

Legacy numeric recid
11865