Extreme precipitation events can lead to severe mountain hazards, and they have therefore received widespread attention. The study of extreme precipitation can be hindered by the insufficient number and uneven distribution of rain gauge stations, especially in mountainous areas with complex terrain. In this study, the daily precipitation data of three gridded precipitation products (Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM, IMERG; Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation, MSWEP; and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission, TRMM) were compared with rain gauge observations at 62 ground stations from 2001 to 2016 over the Hengduan Mountain region in China. Deviations between the gridded and ground precipitation datasets were compared using four daily heavy rainfall sequences. Various extreme precipitation indices were used to evaluate the performance of selected precipitation products. The results show that IMERG and TRMM are better than MSWEP in characterizing extreme precipitation. The accuracy of these three products in detecting heavy precipitation varied with altitude gradient. All products provided more accurate estimates of heavy precipitation in higher-altitude areas than in lower-altitude areas. Notably, they are more applicable for heavy precipitation detection in subalpine or alpine regions, and there are still uncertainties in capturing the accurate characterization of extreme precipitation at low (<1000 m) altitudes in the Hengduan Mountain region. These precipitation products should be used with caution in future applications when analyzing extreme precipitation at low elevations. © 2022 by the authors.
