Techno-bureaucratic doxa and challenges for deliberative governance: The case of community forestry policy and practice in Nepal (2006)

Please fill the following information to request the publication in hardcopy. We will get in touch with you shortly.

* are required.

Despite repeated pleas for participatory and deliberative governance of environmental resources, there is still a predominance of technocratic values in environmental decision-making. This is especially true in the context of forest management in the Global South where centralised and technically-oriented colonial approaches of the past continue to be reproduced and exclude affected people to have their say and share in forest related decision-making and benefit distribution. Taking a case study from Nepal?s Community Forestry Program, this paper shows that despite major shifts towards practices of participatory forestry, the technocratic domination of forest science in governance has taken new and more subtle forms (considered ?doxa? ? taken for granted forms ? after Bourdieu) of control over forestry practices. In this paper, techno-bureaucratic doxa is problematised as a key challenge to deliberative governance, and specific ways are illustrated through which it constrains deliberation in forest governance. Emerging moments of crisis in this doxa are also identified to explore possibilities for greater citizen-public official deliberation in forest governance.
Year: 2006
Language: English
In: Policy and Society Vol 25 no 2, 2006,



 Record created 2011-12-21, last modified 2013-01-17